Ranked #27 of 170 · scores higher than 83% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
26 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including AFG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 85?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly thanks to its return on equity and return on assets, which are stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▲a higher return on assets: stronger than 83% of peers. Return on assets: 2.9% vs peer median 1.2%
▲a higher return on shareholders' equity: stronger than 88% of peers. Return on equity: 19.8% vs peer median 10.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AFG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
AFG
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 146 reported
18.2%
10.7%
77%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 20 reported
14.5%
13.6%
53%
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 170 reported
2.9%
1.3%
80%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 168 reported
20.4%
12.5%
82%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 177 reported
20.2%
0.0%
64%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
