Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ADTRAN Holdings, Inc.
How ADTRAN Holdings, Inc. stacks up
ADTN · against 563 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
79/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #135 of 564 · scores higher than 76% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score51 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including ADTN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 79?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -6.3% vs peer median 2.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 71% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 13.8% vs peer median 2.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 82% of peers. EBITDA yield: 10.4% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ADTN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ADTN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 546 reported | -5.5% | 1.4% | 16% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 581 reported | 10.4% | 3.9% | 79% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 178 reported | 5.6% | 2.1% | 68% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 555 reported | 31.5% | 44.5% | 32% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ADTN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 131 | 14.8B TWD (≈$460M) | 80 | 50 | |
| 131 | 113.6B JPY (≈$772M) | 80 | 74 | |
| 131 | 374M USD | 80 | 35 | |
| 131 | 326M EUR (≈$358M) | 80 | 52 | |
| 135 | 412M USD | 79 | 43 | |
| 135 | 365M EUR (≈$401M) | 79 | 38 | |
| 137 | 7.8B TWD (≈$242M) | 78 | 65 | |
| 137 | 9.1B TWD (≈$281M) | 78 | 65 | |
| 137 | 63.1B JPY (≈$429M) | 78 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score