Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ADT Inc.
How ADT Inc. stacks up
ADT · against 397 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
69/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #148 of 398 · scores higher than 61% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score50 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including ADT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 69?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.1% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 73% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 28.8% vs peer median 7.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 81% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 13.5% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ADT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ADT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 399 reported | 2.1% | 6.5% | 28% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 349 reported | 28.8% | 9.1% | 74% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 393 reported | 13.5% | 6.6% | 74% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ADT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 58 | |
| 4 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 99 | 73 | |
| 4 | 6.1B USD | 99 | 55 | |
| 148 | 43.7B CNY (≈$6.1B) | 69 | 53 | |
| 148 | 1.70T JPY (≈$11.6B) | 69 | 60 | |
| 148 | 1.83T JPY (≈$12.5B) | 69 | 47 | |
| 148 | 11.3B EUR (≈$12.4B) | 69 | 52 | |
| 148 | 7.2B USD | 69 | 61 | |
| 148 | 6.2B USD | 69 | 62 | |
| 148 | 45.4B DKK (≈$6.8B) | 69 | 62 | |
| 157 | 210.0B TWD (≈$6.5B) | 68 | 73 | |
| 157 | 31.1B CNY (≈$4.4B) | 68 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score