Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
How Automatic Data Processing, Inc. stacks up
ADP · against 45 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
58/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #19 of 46 · scores higher than 60% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score2 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including ADP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.1% vs peer median 2.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.8% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ADP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ADP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 47 reported | 3.7% | 2.4% | 63% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 46 reported | 5.4% | 4.1% | 67% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 39 reported | 4.1% | 2.3% | 74% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 46 reported | 5.1% | 11.6% | 22% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ADP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 95.8B USD | 89 | 67 | |
| 2 | 3.46T TWD (≈$107.1B) | 81 | 58 | |
| 2 | 155.8B USD | 81 | 63 | |
| 2 | 164.9B USD | 81 | 89 | |
| 5 | 92.1B USD | 77 | 68 | |
| 14 | 70.5B USD | 70 | 55 | |
| 16 | 66.3B USD | 67 | 55 | |
| 17 | 125.2B USD | 65 | 70 | |
| 18 | 736.3B HKD (≈$94.2B) | 63 | 63 | |
| 19 | 117.3B USD | 58 | 56 | |
| 20 | 561.7B CNY (≈$78.6B) | 57 | 77 | |
| 21 | 68.1B EUR (≈$74.9B) | 49 | 39 | |
| 21 | 81.3B USD | 49 | 48 | |
| 23 | 11.47T JPY (≈$78.0B) | 46 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score