Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
How Automatic Data Processing, Inc. stacks up
ADP · against 46 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
48/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #37 of 47 · scores higher than 22% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score5 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including ADP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.7% vs peer median 8.5%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 10.3% vs peer median 11.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.8% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ADP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ADP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 47 reported | 6.7% | 18.8% | 17% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 39 reported | 10.3% | 22.7% | 32% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 47 reported | 6.8% | 14.3% | 28% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ADP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 125.2B USD | 99 | 70 | |
| 2 | 482.9B CNY (≈$67.6B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 2 | 164.9B USD | 98 | 89 | |
| 4 | 561.7B CNY (≈$78.6B) | 97 | 77 | |
| 5 | 25.82T JPY (≈$175.6B) | 96 | 73 | |
| 32 | 203.8B USD | 60 | 56 | |
| 34 | 18.16T JPY (≈$123.5B) | 55 | 82 | |
| 35 | 66.3B USD | 52 | 55 | |
| 36 | 81.3B USD | 51 | 48 | |
| 37 | 117.3B USD | 48 | 56 | |
| 38 | 155.8B USD | 46 | 63 | |
| 39 | 5.87T TWD (≈$182.0B) | 44 | 46 | |
| 40 | 86.2B USD | 43 | 37 | |
| 41 | 9.04T INR (≈$108.5B) | 42 | 74 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score