Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
How Automatic Data Processing, Inc. stacks up
ADP · against 496 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
58/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #183 of 497 · scores higher than 61% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score55 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including ADP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.1% vs peer median 2.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.8% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ADP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ADP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 495 reported | 3.7% | 1.9% | 70% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 499 reported | 5.4% | 4.0% | 61% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 465 reported | 4.1% | 3.3% | 56% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 490 reported | 5.1% | 22.1% | 14% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ADP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 5 | 662M USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 178 | 6.8B USD | 60 | 74 | |
| 178 | 9.5B USD | 60 | 68 | |
| 182 | 6.5B USD | 59 | 69 | |
| 183 | 3.2B USD | 58 | 64 | |
| 183 | 117.3B USD | 58 | 56 | |
| 183 | 2.5B USD | 58 | 51 | |
| 183 | 747M USD | 58 | 68 | |
| 183 | 2.7B USD | 58 | 48 | |
| 183 | 532M USD | 58 | 25 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score