Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ADNT · against 490 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #438 of 491 · scores higher than 11% of peers · safety percentile 13
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)49 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including ADNT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ADNT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 483 reported | 1.27× | 0.49× | 20% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 481 reported | 1.61 | 0.52 | 6% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 479 reported | 1.10× | 1.47× | 28% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 2 | 5.4B CNY (≈$758M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 2 | 2.6B CAD (≈$1.9B) | 99 | 73 | |
| 4 | 113.9B JPY (≈$775M) | 99 | 70 | |
| 5 | 6.7B HKD (≈$861M) | 98 | 72 | |
| 434 | 359.4B JPY (≈$2.4B) | 14 | 33 | |
| 435 | 2.3B EUR (≈$2.6B) | 14 | 53 | |
| 436 | 1.8B USD | 14 | 46 | |
| 437 | 7.8B SEK (≈$776M) | 13 | 11 | |
| 438 | 1.3B USD | 13 | 44 | |
| 439 | 726M EUR (≈$799M) | 13 | 39 | |
| 440 | 770M USD | 13 | 48 | |
| 441 | 5.5B CNY (≈$766M) | 13 | 50 | |
| 442 | 30.2B TWD (≈$935M) | 13 | 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score