Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ADM · against 53 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #21 of 54 · scores higher than 62% of peers · safety percentile 38
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)7 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including ADM · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Defensive norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ADM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 55 reported | 0.39× | 0.95× | 72% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 54 reported | 0.63 | 0.36 | 11% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 52 reported | 1.39× | 1.13× | 73% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 212.7B CNY (≈$29.8B) | 97 | 72 | |
| 2 | 162.4B CNY (≈$22.7B) | 82 | 81 | |
| 3 | 293.3B CNY (≈$41.1B) | 81 | 54 | |
| 4 | 4.61T INR (≈$55.3B) | 76 | 64 | |
| 5 | 3.41T JPY (≈$23.2B) | 74 | 58 | |
| 17 | 188.5B SEK (≈$18.8B) | 45 | 53 | |
| 18 | 4.88T JPY (≈$33.2B) | 44 | 56 | |
| 19 | 861.7B MXN (≈$46.5B) | 41 | 60 | |
| 20 | 29.9B EUR (≈$32.9B) | 39 | 49 | |
| 21 | 34.0B USD | 38 | 39 | |
| 22 | 25.9B USD | 38 | 53 | |
| 23 | 141.9B CNY (≈$19.9B) | 37 | 33 | |
| 24 | 24.5B USD | 34 | 52 | |
| 25 | 13.3B GBP (≈$17.3B) | 31 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score