Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Adamas Trust, Inc.
How Adamas Trust, Inc. stacks up
ADAM · against 226 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
99/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #1 of 227 · scores higher than 98% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score33 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including ADAM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 99?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 89% of peers. Earnings yield: 35.7% vs peer median 5.3%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 93% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 26.5% vs peer median 6.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 95% of peers. EBITDA yield: 22.6% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ADAM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ADAM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 247 reported | -9.8% | 5.5% | 13% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 228 reported | Not reported | 5.5% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 83 reported | 30.6% | 9.2% | 94% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 251 reported | 171.3% | 119.7% | 71% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ADAM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 1 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 1 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | 9.23T IDR (≈$572M) | 99 | 88 | |
| 1 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 99 | 77 | |
| 1 | 12.33T IDR (≈$764M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 7 | 45.8B JPY (≈$311M) | 98 | 88 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score