Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AD · against 119 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Ranked #59 of 120 · scores higher than 51% of peers · safety percentile 55
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)15 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including AD · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger beta, but weaker debt / equity and current ratio than most Communication Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 116 reported | 0.94× | 0.40× | 26% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 115 reported | 0.30 | 0.59 | 78% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 118 reported | 0.95× | 1.43× | 28% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 615.0B JPY (≈$4.2B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2.3B USD | 97 | 55 | |
| 3 | 93.9B MXN (≈$5.1B) | 97 | 82 | |
| 4 | 12.0B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 95 | 29 | |
| 5 | 35.4B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 95 | 65 | |
| 55 | 6.61T KRW (≈$4.8B) | 56 | 44 | |
| 56 | 19.8B SEK (≈$2.0B) | 56 | 34 | |
| 57 | 6.15T KRW (≈$4.4B) | 56 | 64 | |
| 58 | 3.9B GBP (≈$5.1B) | 55 | 68 | |
| 59 | 2.9B USD | 55 | 80 | |
| 60 | 29.5B ZAR (≈$1.6B) | 54 | 59 | |
| 61 | 4.2B GBP (≈$5.4B) | 53 | 68 | |
| 62 | 3.1B USD | 53 | 67 | |
| 63 | 6.4B ILS (≈$1.7B) | 52 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score