Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Acacia Research Corporation
How Acacia Research Corporation stacks up
ACTG · against 845 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
36/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #457 of 846 · scores higher than 45% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score64 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including ACTG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 36?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -2.9% vs peer median 3.8%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 73% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 0.2% vs peer median 3.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.5% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ACTG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ACTG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 840 reported | -3.7% | 2.8% | 17% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 856 reported | 8.7% | 6.4% | 59% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 180 reported | 0.2% | 3.2% | 35% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 846 reported | 126.4% | 56.6% | 88% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ACTGScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score