Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
How Axcelis Technologies, Inc. stacks up
ACLS · against 428 other Technology companies of similar size
Profitability
63/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #185 of 429 · scores higher than 55% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score58 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including ACLS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 63?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets and operating margin, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 7.8% vs peer median 6.8%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 64% of peers. Operating margin: 10.3% vs peer median 6.3%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 75% of peers. Return on assets: 6.7% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ACLS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ACLS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 405 reported | 7.8% | 9.1% | 46% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 428 reported | 10.3% | 7.6% | 59% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 418 reported | 6.7% | 3.6% | 73% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 412 reported | 8.9% | 9.5% | 48% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 430 reported | 43.0% | 33.8% | 65% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ACLS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.8B AUD (≈$3.2B) | 100 | 71 | |
| 2 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 99 | 94 | |
| 2 | 170.7B INR (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 4.0B USD | 99 | 84 | |
| 5 | 388.6B JPY (≈$2.6B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 179 | 65.4B TWD (≈$2.0B) | 64 | 47 | |
| 179 | 2.0B USD | 64 | 60 | |
| 179 | 15.7B DKK (≈$2.4B) | 64 | 44 | |
| 185 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 63 | 80 | |
| 185 | 3.0B USD | 63 | 50 | |
| 185 | 18.7B NOK (≈$1.8B) | 63 | 52 | |
| 185 | 2.7B USD | 63 | 54 | |
| 185 | 3.7B USD | 63 | 71 | |
| 185 | 3.4B USD | 63 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score