Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ACIW · against 315 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #211 of 316 · scores higher than 33% of peers · safety percentile 32
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)32 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including ACIW · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ACIW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 306 reported | 0.58× | 0.30× | 27% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 300 reported | 0.99 | 1.02 | 54% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 313 reported | 1.58× | 1.83× | 38% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 2 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 3 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 4 | 3.5B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 5 | 625.8B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 99 | 78 | |
| 207 | 8.1B USD | 33 | 55 | |
| 208 | 10.6B USD | 33 | 60 | |
| 209 | 42.7B CNY (≈$6.0B) | 33 | 49 | |
| 210 | 4.12T KRW (≈$3.0B) | 33 | 63 | |
| 211 | 5.9B USD | 32 | 55 | |
| 212 | 27.5B CNY (≈$3.9B) | 32 | 61 | |
| 213 | 328.8B TWD (≈$10.2B) | 32 | 37 | |
| 214 | 37.9B CNY (≈$5.3B) | 31 | 58 | |
| 215 | 107.2B TWD (≈$3.3B) | 31 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score