Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Accel Entertainment, Inc.
How Accel Entertainment, Inc. stacks up
ACEL · against 548 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
68/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #181 of 549 · scores higher than 66% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score59 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including ACEL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 68?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.9% vs peer median 4.4%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 62% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.2% vs peer median 6.1%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 82% of peers. EBITDA yield: 13.2% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ACEL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ACEL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 546 reported | 5.6% | 4.4% | 59% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 560 reported | 15.6% | 9.2% | 83% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 147 reported | 8.2% | 7.2% | 54% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 547 reported | 29.5% | 60.5% | 21% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ACEL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 10.4B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 3.9B HKD (≈$498M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 2 | 4.1B HKD (≈$522M) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 4.6B HKD (≈$593M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 176 | 1.5B USD | 69 | 50 | |
| 181 | 3.8B SAR (≈$1.0B) | 68 | 57 | |
| 181 | 16.2B TWD (≈$504M) | 68 | 60 | |
| 181 | 159.4B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 68 | 41 | |
| 181 | 963M USD | 68 | 59 | |
| 181 | 947M EUR (≈$1.0B) | 68 | 59 | |
| 181 | 1.2B USD | 68 | 46 | |
| 187 | 17.1B TWD (≈$530M) | 67 | 74 | |
| 187 | 71.9B INR (≈$862M) | 67 | 71 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score