Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ACDC · against 99 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #93 of 100 · scores higher than 7% of peers · safety percentile 4
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)14 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including ACDC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ACDC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 95 reported | 1.70× | 0.55× | 15% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 98 reported | 1.52 | 0.44 | 1% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 101 reported | 0.84× | 1.46× | 16% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 2 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 3 | 1.2B USD | 98 | 68 | |
| 4 | 10.1B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 97 | 50 | |
| 5 | 1.4B USD | 97 | 80 | |
| 89 | 809M USD | 8 | 39 | |
| 90 | 527M CAD (≈$385M) | 7 | 11 | |
| 91 | 942M USD | 6 | 69 | |
| 92 | 1.2B USD | 6 | 59 | |
| 93 | 759M USD | 4 | 7 | |
| 94 | 1.5B USD | 4 | 49 | |
| 95 | 811M AUD (≈$535M) | 3 | 1 | |
| 96 | 551M GBP (≈$716M) | 2 | 37 | |
| 97 | 5.0B NOK (≈$477M) | 2 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score