Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ProFrac Holding Corp.
How ProFrac Holding Corp. stacks up
ACDC · against 100 other Energy companies of similar size
Profitability
2/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #99 of 101 · scores higher than 2% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score11 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including ACDC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 2?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 98% of peers. Return on assets: -15.7% vs peer median 4.4%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 96% of peers. Return on invested capital: -13.2% vs peer median 9.3%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 95% of peers. Operating margin: -15.0% vs peer median 11.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ACDC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ACDC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 94 reported | -13.2% | 6.6% | 5% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 98 reported | -15.0% | 7.9% | 3% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 100 reported | -15.7% | 2.9% | 1% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 96 reported | -44.8% | 6.5% | 1% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 101 reported | 21.5% | 29.6% | 32% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ACDC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 400M EUR (≈$440M) | 99 | 77 | |
| 1 | 1.3B USD | 99 | 59 | |
| 1 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 1.4B USD | 98 | 80 | |
| 5 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 97 | 98 | |
| 95 | 5.1B CNY (≈$715M) | 6 | 11 | |
| 95 | 1.0B USD | 6 | 24 | |
| 97 | 590M USD | 4 | 21 | |
| 98 | 534M USD | 3 | 24 | |
| 99 | 759M USD | 2 | 7 | |
| 100 | 476M USD | 1 | 2 | |
| 101 | 811M AUD (≈$535M) | 0 | 1 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score