Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Aurora Cannabis Inc.
How Aurora Cannabis Inc. stacks up
ACB · against 380 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Profitability
30/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #231 of 381 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score56 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including ACB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 30?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its operating margin, return on invested capital and return on assets, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 76% of peers. Operating margin: -14.6% vs peer median 7.1%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 75% of peers. Return on invested capital: -10.8% vs peer median 4.7%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 68% of peers. Return on assets: -3.7% vs peer median 1.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ACB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ACB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 347 reported | -10.8% | 0.3% | 34% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 351 reported | -14.6% | 2.9% | 30% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 380 reported | -3.7% | -0.3% | 37% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 359 reported | -9.4% | -1.3% | 40% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 397 reported | 44.2% | 37.1% | 58% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ACB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 595M USD | 99 | 97 | |
| 1 | 433M USD | 99 | 81 | |
| 1 | 578M USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 1 | 609M USD | 99 | 91 | |
| 5 | 4.4B CNY (≈$611M) | 98 | 77 | |
| 231 | 4.0B CNY (≈$561M) | 30 | 33 | |
| 231 | 1.4B MYR (≈$309M) | 30 | 31 | |
| 231 | 40.1B JPY (≈$273M) | 30 | 45 | |
| 231 | 2.4B HKD (≈$310M) | 30 | 52 | |
| 231 | 327M USD | 30 | 40 | |
| 231 | 551M USD | 30 | 27 | |
| 231 | 354M USD | 30 | 41 | |
| 239 | 1.6B HKD (≈$209M) | 29 | 44 | |
| 239 | 201M USD | 29 | 24 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score