Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Arcosa, Inc.
How Arcosa, Inc. stacks up
ACA · against 392 other Industrials companies of similar size
Profitability
74/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #153 of 393 · scores higher than 59% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score64 peers with a profitability score of 70–79, including ACA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 74?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets and operating margin, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 6.9% vs peer median 7.1%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 69% of peers. Operating margin: 12.0% vs peer median 7.7%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 92% of peers. Return on assets: 9.3% vs peer median 3.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ACA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ACA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 369 reported | 6.9% | 10.0% | 33% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 394 reported | 12.0% | 10.4% | 58% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 372 reported | 9.3% | 4.6% | 85% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 371 reported | 8.0% | 11.9% | 28% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 398 reported | 22.8% | 29.3% | 33% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ACA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 69.3B CNY (≈$9.7B) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 1.71T JPY (≈$11.6B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 4 | 26.9B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 7.8B USD | 99 | 82 | |
| 144 | 71.0B NOK (≈$6.7B) | 75 | 55 | |
| 153 | 985.6B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 74 | 63 | |
| 153 | 553.5B JPY (≈$3.8B) | 74 | 70 | |
| 153 | 236.0B TWD (≈$7.3B) | 74 | 67 | |
| 153 | 7.3B USD | 74 | 72 | |
| 153 | 8.3B USD | 74 | 54 | |
| 153 | 31.2B DKK (≈$4.7B) | 74 | 39 | |
| 153 | 97.3B SEK (≈$9.7B) | 74 | 43 | |
| 153 | 6.8B GBP (≈$8.9B) | 74 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score