Ranked #204 of 218 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
33 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including ABTC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its return on assets and return on equity, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a lower return on assets: weaker than 99% of peers. Return on assets: -14.9% vs peer median 1.2%
▼a lower return on shareholders' equity: weaker than 98% of peers. Return on equity: -38.5% vs peer median 10.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ABTC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
ABTC
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 198 reported
-35.0%
9.1%
2%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 35 reported
-106.6%
8.6%
12%
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 219 reported
-14.9%
1.0%
2%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 216 reported
-38.5%
10.1%
1%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 227 reported
52.7%
0.0%
83%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
