Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Abbott Laboratories
How Abbott Laboratories stacks up
ABT · against 24 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
26/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #22 of 25 · scores higher than 8% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score3 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including ABT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 26?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Healthcare peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 91% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -61.0% vs peer median 9.8%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.0% vs peer median 5.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.1% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ABT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ABT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 25 reported | 8.1% | 7.2% | 63% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 25 reported | -61.0% | 22.5% | 4% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 25 reported | 5.0% | 6.0% | 46% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ABT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 126.5B USD | 78 | 56 | |
| 2 | 155.7B USD | 73 | 64 | |
| 3 | 540.4B BRL (≈$97.3B) | 72 | 64 | |
| 3 | 97.5B USD | 72 | 67 | |
| 3 | 162.93T ARS (≈$162.9B) | 72 | 63 | |
| 16 | 317.9B CHF (≈$365.6B) | 49 | 60 | |
| 19 | 161.8B USD | 47 | 50 | |
| 20 | 258.2B USD | 44 | 47 | |
| 21 | 363.0B USD | 38 | 47 | |
| 22 | 189.3B USD | 26 | 45 | |
| 22 | 207.7B USD | 26 | 18 | |
| 24 | 356.9B USD | 20 | 37 | |
| 25 | 171.0B USD | 14 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score