Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ABNB · against 31 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #15 of 32 · scores higher than 55% of peers · safety percentile 37
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)2 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including ABNB · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ABNB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 24 reported | 0.32× | 0.63× | 87% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 32 reported | 1.24 | 0.89 | 23% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 32 reported | 1.41× | 1.15× | 65% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 137.5B EUR (≈$151.2B) | 92 | 70 | |
| 2 | 2.15T MXN (≈$116.3B) | 91 | 87 | |
| 3 | 114.1B USD | 89 | 91 | |
| 4 | 458.9B HKD (≈$58.7B) | 72 | 53 | |
| 5 | 73.8B EUR (≈$81.2B) | 71 | 58 | |
| 11 | 659.6B HKD (≈$84.4B) | 53 | 72 | |
| 12 | 57.2B USD | 47 | 50 | |
| 13 | 78.5B EUR (≈$86.4B) | 47 | 58 | |
| 14 | 174.8B EUR (≈$192.3B) | 42 | 56 | |
| 15 | 100.0B USD | 37 | 58 | |
| 16 | 79.0B USD | 36 | 61 | |
| 17 | 57.0B USD | 25 | 52 | |
| 18 | 79.4B USD | 23 | 46 | |
| 19 | 89.1B AUD (≈$58.8B) | 19 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score