Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ambev S.A.
How Ambev S.A. stacks up
ABEV · against 48 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Valuation
75/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #3 of 49 · scores higher than 96% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score3 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including ABEV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 75?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 74% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.3% vs peer median 4.5%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 74% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.4% vs peer median 6.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 76% of peers. EBITDA yield: 13.9% vs peer median 8.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ABEV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ABEV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 48 reported | 7.2% | 4.5% | 89% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 49 reported | 13.9% | 8.1% | 100% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 20 reported | 11.3% | 5.7% | 89% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 48 reported | 40.1% | 21.5% | 83% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ABEV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 379.9B MXN (≈$20.5B) | 84 | 68 | |
| 2 | 28.1B EUR (≈$30.9B) | 79 | 51 | |
| 3 | 40.7B USD | 75 | 66 | |
| 4 | 22.1B GBP (≈$28.7B) | 71 | 46 | |
| 5 | 70.1B USD | 67 | 47 | |
| 6 | 162.4B CNY (≈$22.7B) | 66 | 81 | |
| 6 | 21.1B EUR (≈$23.2B) | 66 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score