Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to American Battery Technology Company
How American Battery Technology Company stacks up
ABAT · against 313 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
9/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #237 of 314 · scores higher than 21% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score78 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including ABAT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 9?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -54.1% vs peer median 6.9%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -46.4% vs peer median 3.8%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -21.2% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ABAT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ABAT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 307 reported | -46.4% | 1.7% | 4% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 324 reported | -54.1% | 6.0% | 2% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 97 reported | -21.2% | 1.8% | 11% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 315 reported | 71.4% | 67.4% | 53% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ABAT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 3 | 1.4B HKD (≈$174M) | 99 | 53 | |
| 3 | 1.7B HKD (≈$221M) | 99 | 54 | |
| 3 | 1.3B HKD (≈$164M) | 99 | 58 | |
| 237 | 666M SAR (≈$180M) | 9 | 23 | |
| 237 | 8.3B TWD (≈$257M) | 9 | 24 | |
| 237 | 1.6B CNY (≈$225M) | 9 | 27 | |
| 237 | 9.3B TWD (≈$289M) | 9 | 10 | |
| 237 | 178M USD | 9 | 34 | |
| 237 | 334M USD | 9 | 30 | |
| 237 | 321M USD | 9 | 12 | |
| 237 | 4.5B THB (≈$127M) | 9 | 23 | |
| 237 | 277M USD | 9 | 25 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score