Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Allied Gold Corporation
How Allied Gold Corporation stacks up
AAUC · against 182 other Basic Materials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
92/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #36 of 183 · scores higher than 78% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score48 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including AAUC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 92?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 61% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 2.9% vs peer median -0.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 97% of peers. Revenue growth: 82.3% vs peer median 3.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AAUC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AAUC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 187 reported | 82.3% | 9.9% | 90% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 102 reported | Not reported | 17.1% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 180 reported | 2.9% | 1.5% | 55% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AAUC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 8.9B USD | 100 | 85 | |
| 3 | 41.2B USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 3 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 15.9B USD | 99 | 75 | |
| 30 | 43.6B USD | 93 | 81 | |
| 30 | 612M USD | 93 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score