Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Advance Auto Parts, Inc.
How Advance Auto Parts, Inc. stacks up
AAP · against 345 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
50/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #183 of 346 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score42 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including AAP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield, but weaker free cash flow yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 77% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 0.8% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.8% vs peer median 4.4%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 66% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.7% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AAP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AAP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 344 reported | 3.8% | 5.4% | 31% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 353 reported | 11.7% | 9.5% | 65% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 138 reported | 0.8% | 6.0% | 14% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 347 reported | 79.1% | 43.9% | 74% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AAP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 248.4B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 3 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 3 | 8.6B BRL (≈$1.5B) | 97 | 81 | |
| 5 | 12.1B HKD (≈$1.6B) | 96 | 56 | |
| 183 | 7.1B MYR (≈$1.6B) | 50 | 57 | |
| 183 | 29.7B CNY (≈$4.2B) | 50 | 49 | |
| 183 | 14.3B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 50 | 42 | |
| 183 | 322.1B JPY (≈$2.2B) | 50 | 54 | |
| 183 | 2.9B USD | 50 | 28 | |
| 183 | 2.7B USD | 50 | 43 | |
| 183 | 4.2B USD | 50 | 56 | |
| 190 | 23.7B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 49 | 68 | |
| 190 | 2.2B USD | 49 | 64 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score