Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AAMI · against 88 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #76 of 89 · scores higher than 15% of peers · safety percentile 12
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)11 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including AAMI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AAMI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 80 reported | 1.93× | 0.73× | 33% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 92 reported | 1.32 | 0.72 | 14% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 79 reported | 1.05× | 2.40× | 23% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 231.2B INR (≈$2.8B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 2 | 3.1B AUD (≈$2.1B) | 96 | 62 | |
| 3 | 169.7B INR (≈$2.0B) | 95 | 78 | |
| 4 | 5.0B USD | 92 | 47 | |
| 5 | 14.7B CNY (≈$2.1B) | 90 | 76 | |
| 72 | 34.4B CNY (≈$4.8B) | 17 | 40 | |
| 73 | 4.9B USD | 16 | 18 | |
| 74 | 4.0B USD | 14 | 66 | |
| 75 | 1.9B USD | 13 | 47 | |
| 76 | 3.1B USD | 12 | 48 | |
| 77 | 183.3B TWD (≈$5.7B) | 11 | 29 | |
| 78 | 33.8B HKD (≈$4.3B) | 10 | 10 | |
| 79 | 447.2B INR (≈$5.4B) | 9 | ||
| 80 | 286.2B INR (≈$3.4B) | 8 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score