Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Acadian Asset Management Inc.
How Acadian Asset Management Inc. stacks up
AAMI · against 153 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Growth
70/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #55 of 154 · scores higher than 65% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score16 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including AAMI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 70?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 14.2% vs peer median 10.0%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 75% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 18.9% vs peer median 10.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 75% of peers. Revenue growth: 24.2% vs peer median 7.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = AAMI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | AAMI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 179 reported | 24.2% | 10.5% | 70% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 131 reported | 14.2% | 11.4% | 55% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 138 reported | 18.9% | 11.5% | 67% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around AAMI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 3 | 601M USD | 98 | 72 | |
| 3 | 843M USD | 98 | ||
| 5 | 282M USD | 97 | ||
| 50 | 82M USD | 73 | 78 | |
| 50 | 462M USD | 73 | 70 | |
| 53 | 81.4B USD | 72 | 54 | |
| 54 | 1.0B USD | 71 | 48 | |
| 55 | 3.1B USD | 70 | 48 | |
| 56 | 8.4B USD | 69 | 63 | |
| 56 | 1.9B USD | 69 | 45 | |
| 58 | 5.9B USD | 68 | 69 | |
| 59 | 70.1B USD | 67 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score