Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AAL · against 366 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #364 of 367 · scores higher than 1% of peers · safety percentile 1
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)35 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including AAL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | AAL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 364 reported | Not reported | 0.55× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 355 reported | 1.38 | 0.85 | 10% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 354 reported | 0.53× | 1.57× | 2% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.5B USD | 100 | 33 | |
| 2 | 5.7B USD | 99 | 36 | |
| 3 | 112.9B MXN (≈$6.1B) | 97 | 93 | |
| 4 | 1.36T JPY (≈$9.2B) | 96 | 70 | |
| 5 | 47.5B CNY (≈$6.6B) | 96 | 65 | |
| 360 | 7.2B USD | 3 | 61 | |
| 361 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 6.2B USD |
| 3 |
| 34 |
| 362 | 12.69T CLP (≈$14.0B) | 3 | 64 |
| 363 | 10.8B USD | 3 | 39 |
| 364 | 8.5B USD | 1 | 21 |
| 365 | 5.7B USD | 1 | 49 |
| 366 | 146.6B TWD (≈$4.5B) | 1 | 51 |
| 367 | 8.2B EUR (≈$9.0B) | 0 | 33 |