Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Agilent Technologies, Inc.
How Agilent Technologies, Inc. stacks up
A · against 60 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Valuation
53/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #40 of 61 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score15 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including A · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 3.7% vs peer median 4.0%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 61% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.9% vs peer median 1.5%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 2.6% vs peer median 0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = A, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | A | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 58 reported | 2.9% | 3.0% | 47% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 62 reported | 4.0% | 6.1% | 30% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 44 reported | 2.6% | 4.0% | 28% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 57 reported | 14.9% | 22.1% | 27% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around A| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.61T JPY (≈$31.3B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 2 | 78.1B USD | 89 | 60 | |
| 3 | 97.5B USD | 87 | 67 | |
| 4 | 6.17T JPY (≈$42.0B) | 86 | 70 | |
| 5 | 45.9B USD | 84 | 61 | |
| 36 | 4.25T INR (≈$51.0B) | 56 | 70 | |
| 37 | 45.6B CHF (≈$52.4B) | 55 | 55 | |
| 37 | 48.9B USD | 55 | 54 | |
| 39 | 272.9B BRL (≈$49.1B) | 54 | 43 | |
| 40 | 49.5B USD | 53 | 53 | |
| 41 | 34.6B USD | 51 | 58 | |
| 41 | 34.0B USD | 51 | 49 | |
| 43 | 67.60T KRW (≈$48.7B) | 50 | 72 | |
| 43 | 36.0B USD | 50 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score