Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Agilent Technologies, Inc.
How Agilent Technologies, Inc. stacks up
A · against 58 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
48/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #37 of 59 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score12 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including A · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 48?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 65% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 1.8% vs peer median 5.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.6% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 18.7% vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = A, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | A | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 59 reported | 8.6% | 9.9% | 48% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 47 reported | 18.7% | 12.7% | 67% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 59 reported | 1.8% | 6.5% | 19% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around A| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56.7B USD | 96 | 79 | |
| 2 | 40.2B USD | 92 | 73 | |
| 3 | 4.61T JPY (≈$31.3B) | 89 | 76 | |
| 4 | 43.30T KRW (≈$31.2B) | 86 | 68 | |
| 4 | 56.0B USD | 86 | 39 | |
| 33 | 6.17T JPY (≈$42.0B) | 53 | 70 | |
| 33 | 25.8B USD | 53 | 75 | |
| 35 | 27.3B USD | 52 | 55 | |
| 36 | 43.2B USD | 50 | 45 | |
| 37 | 49.5B USD | 48 | 53 | |
| 38 | 54.0B USD | 45 | 47 | |
| 38 | 89.7B USD | 45 | 50 | |
| 38 | 34.0B USD | 45 | 49 | |
| 41 | 11.26T JPY (≈$76.6B) | 44 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score